
doi: 10.1257/mac.20140116
handle: 10230/21221
We estimate an aggregate matching function and find that the regression residual, which captures movements in matching efficiency, displays procyclical fluctuations and a dramatic decline after 2007. Using a matching function framework that explicitly takes into account worker heterogeneity as well as market segmentation, we show that matching efficiency movements can be the result of variations in the degree of heterogeneity in the labor market. Matching efficiency declines substantially when, as in the Great Recession, the average characteristics of the unemployed deteriorate substantially, or when dispersion in labor market conditions—the extent to which some labor markets fare worse than others—increases markedly. (JEL E24, E32, J41, J42)
job finding, aggregate, composition, job finding, aggregate, composition, dispersion, dispersion, Macroeconomics and International Economics, jel: jel:E32, jel: jel:J42, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J41, jel: jel:J6
job finding, aggregate, composition, job finding, aggregate, composition, dispersion, dispersion, Macroeconomics and International Economics, jel: jel:E32, jel: jel:J42, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J41, jel: jel:J6
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 78 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
