
handle: 10419/69339
This study explores whether potential employers have the same information about worker ability as the incumbent firm. I develop a model of asymmetric learning that nests the symmetric learning case and allows the degree of asymmetry to vary. I then show how predictions in the model can be tested with compensation data. Using the NLSY, I test the model and find strong support for asymmetric information. My estimates imply that in one period, outside firms reduce the average expectation error over worker ability by only a third of the reduction made by incumbent firms. (JEL D82, J24, J31, M12)
ddc:330, J33, asymmetric information, personnel economics, employer learning, employer learning, D83, asymmetric information, personnel economics, D21, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D83, jel: jel:D21, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:J24, jel: jel:J33, jel: jel:M12
ddc:330, J33, asymmetric information, personnel economics, employer learning, employer learning, D83, asymmetric information, personnel economics, D21, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:D83, jel: jel:D21, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:J24, jel: jel:J33, jel: jel:M12
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
