The RPD Myth…

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Aug 2014 English Publisher:SAGE PublicationsJournal:NIR news, volume 25, pages 24-28 (issn: 0960-3360, eissn: 1756-2708,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Kim H. Esbensen; Paul Geladi; Anders Larsen;

doi: 10.1255/nirn.1462

The RPD Myth…

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

For a long time, the Mythbusters have harboured a grudge about the ubiquitous use of and blind reliance on the RPD statistic as a tell-all index regarding the quality of any NIR calibration. This feeling is substantiated by the many reviews we, and many others, have performed for the NIR community and other journals over more than the last decade. There are apparently very few reservations regarding this institution: if only RPD>3… all is well with prediction performance!

Related Organizations

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Sweden
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Denmark

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	38
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%