
doi: 10.1253/jcj.49.370
pmid: 3981795
Four hundred and sixty-seven cases with implantation of an artificial pacemaker were studied. The postoperative survival rate was 63% for 15 years. Seventy-two percent of type III patients of the sick sinus syndrome were free from postoperative thromboembolism and the lowest of the three types of the sick sinus syndrome. Comparing postoperative physical activity, cardiothoracic ratio and exercise tolerance time, physiological pacing was superior to ventricular pacing in hemodynamic effects and clinical symptoms. In a hundred cases of physiological pacing, complications and problems of physiological pacing were discussed. Atrial sensing failure and over-sensing were observed in seven and two cases respectively. A low amplitude of atrial potential and use of unipolar atrial leads were considered to be the main causes of these complications. Bipolar lead should be used as the atrial lead to avoid such complications, because the atrial potential by bipolar leads is not less than that by unipolar leads. Atrial sensing may be more sensitive without electromagnetic interference. The fixed A-V delay time whenever the atrium is sensed or paced, often results in a ventricular fusion beat and hemodynamic change on every beat, according to the interval of atrial and ventricular contractions. The A-V delay time should be changed in accordance with atrial sensing or pacing.
Sick Sinus Syndrome, Physical Exertion, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Hemodynamics, Electrocardiography, Postoperative Complications, Heart Conduction System, Tachycardia, Thromboembolism, Humans, Electromagnetic Phenomena
Sick Sinus Syndrome, Physical Exertion, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Hemodynamics, Electrocardiography, Postoperative Complications, Heart Conduction System, Tachycardia, Thromboembolism, Humans, Electromagnetic Phenomena
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
