
ABSTRACT The limit of the resolvability of lines, or how small a space can exist between lines and still admit of their being separated under the microscope, appears to be an undecided point. Professor Queckett (‘Treatise on the Microscope,’ 3d ed., p. 238, 1855) asserts that “no achromatic has yet been made capable of separating lines closer together than the of an inch.” In the same work, p. 245, it is stated that Mr. Ross found it impossible to ascertain the position of a line nearer than the of an inch. We find also on p. 512, that Mr. De la Rue, in his extended examination of Nobert’s test-plates, was unable to resolve any lines closer than the of an inch. In Professor Carpenter’s work (‘The Microscope,’ 2d ed., p. 189, 1859) this sentence occurs: “The well-defined lines on Nobert’s test-plates have not yet been resolved -when they have approximated more closely than the of an inch.’’
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
