
pmid: 1814928
ABSTRACTRapid freezing and freeze substitution (RF-FS) have been used to re-examine the process by which the multinucleate sporangium of the Oomycetes, Phytophthora cinnamomi and P. palmivora, is subdivided into uninucleate zoospores. The results indicate a new model for sporangial cleavage in Phytophthora and suggest that the currently accepted model is based on interpretation of artefacts caused by chemical fixation. The previous model describes cleavage as a two-stage process in which specialized cleavage vesicles first become positioned at the boundaries of each future subdivision and later fuse to compartmentalize the sporangium. RF-FS, however, indicates that cleavage results from the progressive extension of paired sheets of membrane along the future subdivision boundaries. These sheets finally interconnect and subdivide the sporangium. Cleavage vesicles are only evident in preliminary stages of this process and are never aligned along the future boundaries, contrary to the observations of studies based on chemical fixation. Chemical fixation apparently causes the membranous sheets to vesiculate, even at relatively advanced stages of cleavage, thus giving the misleading impression that the resulting network of lined-up vesicles is an intermediate stage in the cleavage process. This finding has wide-ranging implications for the understanding of eukaryotic cytokinesis, because all previous studies that describe vesicle alignment and fusion have relied upon chemical fixation. Other novel features revealed by RF-FS include an extensive extracellular matrix within the sporangium that could be involved in zoospore release, and a trans-Golgi network.
Cryopreservation, Phytophthora, Spores, Microscopy, Electron, Eukaryotic Cells, Intracellular Membranes, Artifacts, Giant Cells, Cell Division, Extracellular Matrix
Cryopreservation, Phytophthora, Spores, Microscopy, Electron, Eukaryotic Cells, Intracellular Membranes, Artifacts, Giant Cells, Cell Division, Extracellular Matrix
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 57 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
