Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Micromere lineages in the glossiphoniid leechHelobdella

Authors: Françoise Z, Huang; Dongmin, Kang; Felipe-Andres, Ramirez-Weber; Shirley T, Bissen; David A, Weisblat;

Micromere lineages in the glossiphoniid leechHelobdella

Abstract

In leech embryos, segmental mesoderm and ectoderm arise from teloblasts by lineages that are already relatively well characterized. Here, we present data concerning the early divisions and the definitive fate maps of the micromeres, a group of 25 small cells that arise during the modified spiral cleavage in leech (Helobdella robusta) and contribute to most of the nonsegmental tissues of the adult. Three noteworthy results of this work are as follows. (1) The c′′′ and dm′ clones (3d and 3c in traditional nomenclature) give rise to a hitherto undescribed network of fibers that run from one end of the embryo to the other. (2) The clones of micromeres b′′ and b′′′ (2b and 3b in traditional nomenclature) die in normal development; the b′′ clone can be rescued to assume the normal c′′ fate if micromere c′′ or its clone are ablated in early development. (3) Two qualitative differences in micromere fates are seen between H. robusta (Sacramento) and another Helobdella sp. (Galt). First, in Helobdella sp. (Galt), the clone of micromere b′′ does not normally die, and contributes a subset of the cells arising exclusively from c′′ in H. robusta (Sacramento). Second, in Helobdella sp. (Galt), micromere c′′′ makes no definitive contribution, whereas micromere dm′ gives rise to cells equivalent to those arising from c′′′ and dm′ in H. robusta (Sacramento).

Keywords

Blastomeres, Species Specificity, Mollusca, Annelida, Leeches, Morphogenesis, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Lineage

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    40
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
40
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!