Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
Neurosurgeryarrow_drop_down
Neurosurgery
Article . 1983 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Neurosurgery
Article . 1983 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Neurosurgery
Article . 1984
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Congenital Hydrocephalus Revealed in the Inbred Rat, LEW/Jms

Authors: Hitoshi Goto; Kyotaro Kanazawa; Hartmut Collmann; Katsuko Sudo; Yoshitaka Omata; Kiyoshi Suzuki; Koji Furuya; +2 Authors

Congenital Hydrocephalus Revealed in the Inbred Rat, LEW/Jms

Abstract

We studied the development of congenital hydrocephalus found in a colony of an inbred strain of Wistar-Lewis rats (LEW/Jms) at various intervals after birth. The disorder was transmitted as a simple recessive mendelian character. Hydrocephalic neonates were recognized 2 days after birth by stretching of the skin over the head. Death usually occurred between 10 and 20 days of age. The findings suggested the possibility of a disturbance of cerebrospinal fluid circulation resulting from primary occlusion of the 3rd or lateral ventricles during embryological development. In later phases, the hydrocephalus was aggravated by obliteration of the subarachnoid space and by stenosis of the aqueduct occurring secondary to compression of these structures from increased pressure within the brain. In some animals, external hydrocephalus occurred as a result of rupture of the occipital pole and the establishment of a direct communication between the lateral ventricles and the subdural space. We looked for antibodies against viruses that have been known to produce hydrocephalus in experimental animals and obtained entirely negative results.

Keywords

Rats, Inbred Lew, Cerebral Aqueduct, Animals, Brain, Rats, Inbred Strains, Constriction, Pathologic, Cerebral Ventricles, Hydrocephalus, Pedigree, Rats

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?