
Eschewing national frames in favor of regional patterns, the chapter presents observations concerning “demotic” photographic practices in Nepal, Bangladesh, and India. It attempts to balance differences in local practices with medium specificity. The technical visual conditions of citizenship (such as in the obligatory wearing of a “Dhaka topi” in Nepal) are juxtaposed with a more diffuse “photographability,” as elaborated by Azoulay, which establishes expectations about the relationship between photographic visibility and citizenship claims. With the help of Kracauer, it is then argued that photography is best viewed as a deterritorializing and future-oriented practice that points to what is yet-to-be. The question of “contingency” is embraced in relation to medium specificity, its elimination or minimization being recognized as a cultural ideal but one that is difficult to achieve in practice. Finally, the conflict between Azoulay's vision of the (secular) “citizenry of photography” and a “messianic imagination” is described.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
