Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of Ondansetron with Ondansetron Plus Dexamethasone in the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Authors: Heidi Abdelhady; Deepa J. Karambelkar; Theodore J. Riley; Boonrak Tantisira; Ray McKenzie;

Comparison of Ondansetron with Ondansetron Plus Dexamethasone in the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Abstract

The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study was to compare the effectiveness of ondansetron plus saline versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Of 180 women having general anesthesia for major gynecologic surgery, 89 received intravenous ondansetron, 4 mg, plus saline (Group 1) and 91 received intravenous ondansetron, 4 mg, plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group 2) during their operation. A complete response, defined as no emesis and no need for rescue antiemetic during the 24-h postoperative period, occurred in 38% of patients in Group 1 and in 52% in Group 2 (P = 0.048). Emesis occurred in 34% of patients in Group 1 and in 15% in Group 2 (P = 0.003). Nausea scores were significantly lower for patients in Group 2 at 2 h (P = 0.023) and at 24 h (P = 0.001). In the ondansetron plus dexamethasone group, 9 out of 10 patients who received propofol for induction of anesthesia had no emesis. The only failure occurred in a patient who had a single emetic episode during the 24th postoperative hour. The combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone was more effective than ondansetron and saline in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting for women having major gynecologic surgery.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Adolescent, Vomiting, Nausea, Middle Aged, Ondansetron, Dexamethasone, Postoperative Complications, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    123
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
123
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?