Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The AAPS Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The AAPS Journal
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The AAPS Journal
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
The AAPS Journal
Article . 2014
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Analyzing Subvisible Particles in Protein Drug Products: a Comparison of Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Resonant Mass Measurement (RMM)

Authors: Joseph Kotarek; Ewa Marszal; Elizabeth M. Topp; Jainik P. Panchal;

Analyzing Subvisible Particles in Protein Drug Products: a Comparison of Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Resonant Mass Measurement (RMM)

Abstract

Aggregation is common in protein drug manufacture, and while the effects of protein particulates are under investigation, many techniques applicable for their characterization have been recently developed. Among the methods available to characterize and quantify protein aggregates, none is applicable over the full size range and different methods often give conflicting results. The studies presented here compare two such methods: dynamic light scattering (DLS) and resonant mass measurement (RMM). The performance of each method was first characterized using polystyrene particle size standards (20, 60, 100, 200, 400, and 1,000 nm) over a range of concentrations. Standard particles were measured both singly and in binary mixtures containing 20 nm particles at a fixed concentration (10(14) particles/mL) and various concentrations of one of the other particle sizes (i.e., 60, 100, 200, 400, or 1,000 nm). DLS and RMM were then used to detect unknown aggregate content in stressed samples of IgG. Both instruments were shown to have a working range that depends on particle size and concentration. In binary mixtures and polydisperse solutions, DLS was able to resolve two species in a manner dependent on both concentration and particle size. RMM was able to resolve particles above 200 nm (150 nm for protein) at concentrations below 10(9) particles/mL. In addition, dilution was evaluated as a technique to confirm and quantify the number of particles in solution.

Keywords

Light, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Immunoglobulin G, Nanoparticles, Polystyrenes, Proteins, Scattering, Radiation, Particle Size, Mass Spectrometry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    85
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
85
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze