
In a recent issue of Cognitive Science, * Yoav Shoham (1990) proposed a theory of causation based on a nonmonotonic logic of temporal knowledge. It is the purpose of this commentary to show that Shoham’s procedure is essentially isomorphic with a theory of causal ordering that requires no special nonmonotonic logic. Although this latter causal ordering theory is compatible with the requirement that causes precede their effects, it can also be used to describe systems in which causes and effects are simultaneous. This discussion will employ a version of the causal ordering theory that uses Boolean truth functions of sentences (Simon, 1952; reprinted in Simon, 1977, chap. 2.2) rather than the more famliar version that uses mathematical functions of real variables (Simon, 1953; reprinted in Simon, 1977, chap. 2.1) as the material of construction. This will make the relation to Shoham’s theory easier to see. The discussion here will be largely informal; the formalities are easily supplied by reference to the original articles by Shoham (1990) and Simon (1952, 1953).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
