Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1201/978142...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1201/978142...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Split Ring Resonators and Related Topologies

Authors: Ricardo Marqués; Ferran Martín;

Split Ring Resonators and Related Topologies

Abstract

In 1852, W. Weber invoked Faraday’s law to suggest that natural diamagnetism could be produced by currents induced in microscopic conducting closed loops, which would be present inside matter. Spirals are well-known designs, widely used in planar microwave circuits as small-size inductors and resonators. However, spirals are low-symmetry structures and, in particular, they do not show inversion symmetry. Therefore, in spite of the fact that a quasi-static analysis does not predict them, bianisotropy and other cross-polarization effects can be present in metamaterials made from spiral resonators. Split ring resonators (SRRs) provide a simple and effective way for designing magnetic metamaterials with negative parameters. The behavior of SRRs at infrared and optical frequencies can be obtained from a straightforward extension of the aforementioned LC circuit model. The main effects at these frequencies are the saturation in the SRR frequency of resonance and a strong decrease in the SRR magnetic response.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!