Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Population kinetics of progression free survival (PFS).

Authors: David J. Stewart; Mark Clemons; Stephanie Yasmin Brule; Alberto Ocaña; Andrew G. Robinson; Michael Ong; Dominick Bossé; +2 Authors

Population kinetics of progression free survival (PFS).

Abstract

e18251 Background: We assessed drug type impact on whether PFS curves could be fit by 2 phase decay models on nonlinear regression analysis (NLRA). Methods: We digitized 894 published PFS curves for incurable cancers. We used GraphPad Prism 7 for 1 phase and 2 phase decay NLRA, with constraints Y0 = 100 and plateau = 0. We defined curves as fitting 2 phase models if each subpopulation was ≥1% of the entire population and if subpopulation half-lives differed by a factor of ≥2, or if log-linear plots demonstrated unequivocal 2 phase decay. Results: PFS curves for single agents showed either high (≥75%) or low ( < 30%) probability of 2 phase decay, depending on drug type (p < 0.0001, Table). 11/11 PD1/ipilimumab combinations had 2 phase decay vs 36/209 curves (17%) for all other combinations. Conclusions: Drugs have either high or low probability of PFS curve 2 phase decay. Clinical trial methods or some mechanisms of acquired resistance might contribute to 2 phase decay, but 2 phase decay also could indicate a dichotomous factor (eg gene mutation/deletion or complete pathway silencing) producing 2 distinct subpopulations with differing progression rates. Drugs with high 2 phase decay could be prime candidates for RNA & whole genome sequencing, pathway expression studies etc to identify dichotomous predictive factors. Further assessment is needed to better understand why some drugs behave differently when given in combinations vs as single agents. [Table: see text]

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!