<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Larynx Preservation: A Debate Worth Preserving

Name: Larynx Preservation: A Debate Worth Preserving
Creator: Robert I. Haddad
Keywords: Male, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Speech, Female, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Organ Sparing Treatments

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Sep 2013Publisher:American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)Journal:Journal of Clinical Oncology, volume 31, pages 3,170-3,170 (issn: 0732-183X, eissn: 1527-7755,

Authors: Robert I. Haddad;

doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.49.1332

pmid: 23897959

Larynx Preservation: A Debate Worth Preserving

- Summary
- Subjects
- Related research
  (4)
- Metrics

Related Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
United States
Harvard University
United States

Keywords

Male, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Speech, Female, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Organ Sparing Treatments, Deglutition

4 Research products, page 1 of 1

Long-Term Results of RTOG 91-11: A Comparison of Three Nonsurgical Treatment Strategies to Preserve the Larynx in Patients With Locally Advanced Larynx Cancer
2013IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Organ preservation for advanced laryngeal carcinoma
2006IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Severe late dysphagia and cause of death after concurrent chemoradiation for larynx cancer in patients eligible for RTOG 91-11
2016IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
Outcome of Salvage Total Laryngectomy Following Organ Preservation Therapy
2003IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	25
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%