<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 20.500.11940/2480
e19505 Background: Although its mortality has decreased in the last years, neutropenic fever is still one of the most important oncological emergencies. Methods: We have assessed the epidemiological data on patients admitted or evaluated for neutropenic sepsis in a third level cancer center from January 2009 to December 2010. Results: We have found 68 patients who had at least one episode of febrile neutropenia, of them 66% were male and 34% female, and the mean age was 59 years. The performance status was 0 and 1 in 80% of patients and only 19% percent had serious comorbilities such as renal dysfunction, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus or chronic pulmonary disease. 36% of our patients had a high risk neutropenic fever per MASCC criteria. The majority of patients were lung cancer (31%) breast cancer (22%); and gastrointestinal cancer (28%) and 53% where treated with palliative intention. The episodes of febrile neutropenia were more frequent in patients in first line of treatment (72%) and first cycle of any treatment (42%). 8% of patients were treated with chemorradiation and 35% of the patients were receiving prophylaxis with GCSF. There was no found the source of the infection in 45% of patients. 25% had positive cultures. The porcetaje of infections with gram-positive and-negative was very similar. Patients were treated with a combination of amikacine and ceftacidime in 63% of times, further addition of vancomicine or antifungical therapies were only needed in minority of patients, 88% percent of patients received granulocyte stimulating factors. The mean duration of the neutropenia was of 2 days. Following chemotherapy treatment doses were reduced in 44% of patients and delayed in 26%. Thirteen percent of patients received secondary prophylaxis with GCSF, treatment regimen changed was changed in only 2% of patients and 29% received no further treatment. Conclusions: The mortality rate was of 3%, and the time of hospitalization was short (mean of 7 days). Febrile neutropenia remains a serious complication that we have to decrease.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |