Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Retrospective study of febrile neutropenia.

Authors: Nieves Martinez Lago; Rafael Varela Ponte; Luis León; Yolanda Vidal; C. Lopez; Santiago Aguin Losada; Francisco Baron; +5 Authors

Retrospective study of febrile neutropenia.

Abstract

e19505 Background: Although its mortality has decreased in the last years, neutropenic fever is still one of the most important oncological emergencies. Methods: We have assessed the epidemiological data on patients admitted or evaluated for neutropenic sepsis in a third level cancer center from January 2009 to December 2010. Results: We have found 68 patients who had at least one episode of febrile neutropenia, of them 66% were male and 34% female, and the mean age was 59 years. The performance status was 0 and 1 in 80% of patients and only 19% percent had serious comorbilities such as renal dysfunction, cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus or chronic pulmonary disease. 36% of our patients had a high risk neutropenic fever per MASCC criteria. The majority of patients were lung cancer (31%) breast cancer (22%); and gastrointestinal cancer (28%) and 53% where treated with palliative intention. The episodes of febrile neutropenia were more frequent in patients in first line of treatment (72%) and first cycle of any treatment (42%). 8% of patients were treated with chemorradiation and 35% of the patients were receiving prophylaxis with GCSF. There was no found the source of the infection in 45% of patients. 25% had positive cultures. The porcetaje of infections with gram-positive and-negative was very similar. Patients were treated with a combination of amikacine and ceftacidime in 63% of times, further addition of vancomicine or antifungical therapies were only needed in minority of patients, 88% percent of patients received granulocyte stimulating factors. The mean duration of the neutropenia was of 2 days. Following chemotherapy treatment doses were reduced in 44% of patients and delayed in 26%. Thirteen percent of patients received secondary prophylaxis with GCSF, treatment regimen changed was changed in only 2% of patients and 29% received no further treatment. Conclusions: The mortality rate was of 3%, and the time of hospitalization was short (mean of 7 days). Febrile neutropenia remains a serious complication that we have to decrease.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research