Cognitive–behavioural toxicity? Reflections from Westminster

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Sep 2016 English Publisher:Royal College of PsychiatristsJournal:British Journal of Psychiatry, volume 209, pages 262-262 (issn: 0007-1250, eissn: 1472-1465,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Samuel C, Yates; Mesfin, Mengistu;

doi: 10.1192/bjp.209.3.262

pmid: 27587763

Cognitive–behavioural toxicity? Reflections from Westminster

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

At our local journal club at the Gordon Hospital, Westminster, we recently read the excellent paper by Crawford et al on patient experience of negative effects of psychological treatments.[1][1] All present were first struck by the novelty of the concept of considering the side-effect profiles of

Related Organizations

National Health Service
United Kingdom
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
United Kingdom

Keywords

Cognition, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Humans

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average