
pmid: 23377211
Kelleher et al ’s study is very interesting and raises some important questions,[1][1] but we think that it also has some confounding factors that need to be addressed before conclusions are made. In addition, there are some methodological issues which we would like to be clarified. The response
Male, Hallucinations, Psychotic Disorders, Humans, Female, Delusions
Male, Hallucinations, Psychotic Disorders, Humans, Female, Delusions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
