Reattribution for medically unexplained symptoms

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Apr 2008 Netherlands English Publisher:Royal College of PsychiatristsJournal:British Journal of Psychiatry, volume 192, pages 314-315 (issn: 0007-1250, eissn: 1472-1465,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Ravesteijn, H.J. van; Lucassen, P.L.B.J.; Olde Hartman, T.C.;

doi: 10.1192/bjp.192.4.314a

handle: 2066/71264

Reattribution for medically unexplained symptoms

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Morriss et al [1][1] performed a high-quality cluster randomised controlled trial in which reattribution for medically unexplained symptoms was taught to general practitioners (GPs). We compliment the authors on this trial. Strong points of their trial are the avoidance of selection bias by using an

Country

Netherlands

Related Organizations

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Netherlands
Radboud University Nijmegen
Netherlands
Royal College of Psychiatrists
United Kingdom

Keywords

EBP 3: Effective Primary Care and Public Health, NCEBP 7: Effective primary care and public health

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	7
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average