
pmid: 16260823
BackgroundAdherence to treatment guidelines enhances treatment outcome. However, in clinical practice many patients with depression do not receive appropriate treatment.AimsTo evaluate the treatment of depression in in-patients of German psychiatric hospitals with respect to treatment outcome and adherence to guidelines.MethodWe recruited 1202 in-patients with depression from ten different hospitals. Quality data concerning treatment were collected at admission, during the treatment course and at discharge.ResultsThe level of depression was significantly decreased and most patients were satisfied with treatment. Many aspects of the treatment routine adhered to guideline recommendations. Adherence to guidelines could be improved with respect to adjustment of antidepressant dosage, reduction of benzodiazepine prescription, enhanced use of electroconvulsive therapy and wider use of interpersonal therapy.ConclusionsThe study reveals a high standard of psychiatric treatment of in-patients with depression. Nevertheless there is still room for improvement. Differences between hospitals in adherence to guidelines indicates the need for individual application of quality management tools.
Adult, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Analysis of Variance, Depressive Disorder, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Antidepressive Agents, Drug Administration Schedule, Hospitalization, Psychotherapy, Germany, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Female, Guideline Adherence, Health Services Research, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Aged
Adult, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Analysis of Variance, Depressive Disorder, Middle Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Antidepressive Agents, Drug Administration Schedule, Hospitalization, Psychotherapy, Germany, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Female, Guideline Adherence, Health Services Research, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
