
doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.1.15
pmid: 12835238
BackgroundThe unavailability of psychotropic and analgesic drugs for medical purposes results in suffering that goes unrelieved. Their excessive availability results in overmedication and suffering of a different kind.AimsTo highlight the discrepancies between the demand for and supply of controlled drugs for licit purposes by different communities, and to promote their rational utilisation.MethodReview of the United Nations, World Health Organization and other literature on the licit use of narcotic analgesics and psychotropic substances.ResultsThereare large differences in the use of psychotropics and analgesics by different countries. The differences between industrialised and non-industrialised countries are particularly striking. There is evidence of unmet need in some countries and overutilisation in others.ConclusionsGovernments, international organisations, health professionals and the pharmaceutical industry must work together to ensure an adequate supply of psychotropic and analgesic drugs for medical and scientific purposes, and to implement appropriate measures to minimise the development of misuse and dependence.
Analgesics, Psychotropic Drugs, Drug Industry, Anxiety, Global Health, Drug Costs, Health Services Accessibility, Telemedicine, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Drug and Narcotic Control, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Developing Countries
Analgesics, Psychotropic Drugs, Drug Industry, Anxiety, Global Health, Drug Costs, Health Services Accessibility, Telemedicine, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Drug and Narcotic Control, Humans, Ethics, Medical, Developing Countries
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
