
BackgroundChildren in stepfamilies and single-parent families exhibit elevated levels of behavioural and emotional problems compared with children in intact (biological) families, but there is variation within and across these family types.AimsTo examine the sources of variation in children's behavioural and emotional problems across diverse family settings.MethodLevels of behavioural and emotional problems in children from diverse stepfamilies and single-parent families were compared with children living with both biological parents. Psychosocial risks were measured at the individual child and family levels.ResultsBehavioural and emotional problems were elevated in children in stepmother/complex stepfamilies and single-parent families, but not in simple stepfather families, relative to ‘biological’ families. Psychopathology associated with family type was explained by compromised quality of the parent–child relationship, parental depression and socio-economic adversity. Sibling similarity in behavioural and emotional problems was most pronounced in high-risk family settings.ConclusionsFamily type is a proxy for exposure to psychosocial risks; the extent of family-wide influence on children's development may be strongest in high-stress settings.
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Family Characteristics, Models, Statistical, 330, Adolescent, Parenting, Behavioral Symptoms, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Family, Parent-Child Relations, Child, Stress, Psychological
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Family Characteristics, Models, Statistical, 330, Adolescent, Parenting, Behavioral Symptoms, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Family, Parent-Child Relations, Child, Stress, Psychological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 80 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
