
pmid: 11388964
BackgroundCommunity mental health teams are now generally recommended for the management of severe mental illness but a comparative evaluation of their effectiveness is lacking.AimsTo assess the benefits of community mental health team management in severe mental illness.MethodA systematic review was conducted of community mental health team management compared with other standard approaches.ResultsCommunity mental health team management is associated with fewer deaths by suicide and in suspicious circumstances (odds ratio=0.32, 95% CI 0.09–1.12), less dissatisfaction with care (odds ratio=0.34, 95% CI 0.2–0.59) and fewer drop-outs (odds ratio=0.61, 95% CI 0.45–0.83). Duration of in-patient psychiatric treatment is shorter with community team management and costs of care are less, but there are no gains in clinical symptomatology or social functioning.ConclusionsCommunity mental health team management is superior to standard care in promoting greater acceptance of treatment, and may also reduce hospital admission and avoid deaths by suicide. This model of care is effective and deserves encouragement.
Adult, Male, Patient Care Team, Patient Dropouts, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Health Care Costs, Middle Aged, Community Mental Health Services, Hospitalization, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Aged
Adult, Male, Patient Care Team, Patient Dropouts, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Health Care Costs, Middle Aged, Community Mental Health Services, Hospitalization, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 105 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
