
BackgroundAlthough the benefits of public knowledge of physical diseases are widely accepted, knowledge about mental disorders (mental health literacy) has been comparatively neglected.AimsTo introduce the concept of mental health literacy to a wider audience, to bring together diverse research relevant to the topic and to identify gaps in the area.MethodA narrative review within a conceptual framework.ResultsMany members of the public cannot recognise specific disorders or different types of psychological distress. They differ from mental health experts in their beliefs about the causes of mental disorders and the most effective treatments. Attitudes which hinder recognition and appropriate help-seeking are common. Much of the mental health information most readily available to the public is misleading. However, there is some evidence that mental health literacy can be improved.ConclusionsIf the public's mental health literacy is not improved, this may hinder public acceptance of evidence-based mental health care. Also, many people with common mental disorders may be denied effective self-help and may not receive appropriate support from others in the community.
mental health care, Practice, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, evidence based medicine, distress syndrome, Health Knowledge, Mental Disorders, review, self help, 401, Patient Accepta, social support, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, community care, mental disease, Self Care, Keywords: attitude, Attitudes, Public Opinion, Humans, medical education, mental health
mental health care, Practice, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, evidence based medicine, distress syndrome, Health Knowledge, Mental Disorders, review, self help, 401, Patient Accepta, social support, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, community care, mental disease, Self Care, Keywords: attitude, Attitudes, Public Opinion, Humans, medical education, mental health
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
