
Five aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of multiple personality disorder (MPD) were examined. The following five conclusions were made: the contemporary diagnostic criteria are vague and overinclusive; the recent alleged increase in prevalence of the disorder is almost certainly artefactual; legal proceedings involving MPD patients raise disturbing questions about personal responsibility; there is little literature support for the theory that MPD results from childhood trauma; and many of the techniques used to diagnose and treat the condition reinforce its symptoms. A careful revision of diagnostic criteria for the disorder is recommended.
Adult, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Social Responsibility, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Liability, Legal, Child Abuse, Sexual, Insanity Defense, Regression, Psychology, Diagnosis, Differential, Psychotherapy, Terminology as Topic, Humans, Female, Child
Adult, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Social Responsibility, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Liability, Legal, Child Abuse, Sexual, Insanity Defense, Regression, Psychology, Diagnosis, Differential, Psychotherapy, Terminology as Topic, Humans, Female, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
