
doi: 10.1192/bjp.129.1.40
pmid: 820396
SummaryData from non-rapid-cycling bipolar (manic-depressive) patients who were receiving long-term treatment with lithium carbonate were analysed by the life table method to determine when lithium carbonate prophylaxis failures occurred. Forty-four of 96 patients failed to keep well in spite of maintenance lithium therapy. The analysis revealed an early, rapid failure rate during the first six months of treatment, which was followed by a slower rate of failure. Several clinical factors were assessed to determine if any of them predicted which patients would experience their initial failure in the early or late interval, but none of these factors, which included age, sex, age of onset, rate of affective attacks, family history, and the nature of the preceding episode, were found to have any predictive value regarding lithium prophylaxis failure. We found, however, that patients who had early failures tended to have a subsequent early failure in spite of continued maintenance with lithium carbonate.
Adult, Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Bipolar Disorder, Time Factors, Depression, Age Factors, Lithium, Middle Aged, Long-Term Care, Placebos, Sex Factors, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Recurrence, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Probability
Adult, Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Bipolar Disorder, Time Factors, Depression, Age Factors, Lithium, Middle Aged, Long-Term Care, Placebos, Sex Factors, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Recurrence, Humans, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 104 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
