
doi: 10.1190/1.3628024
Theoretical evaluation of elastic impedance (EI) and ray impedance (RI) reveals that RI has a more reliable dimension and is less sensitive to errors than EI. In this paper, a new measurement (R I) is proposed to estimate ray impedance from the elastic impedance derived by existing techniques. The recovered R I is expressed in the form of a normalization of the elastic impedance (EI), and it has the same dimension and interpretation capability as RI. Tests of these three measurements are performed on the log data of three different types of reservoir: a typical Class III marine gas sand, a Class I tight gas-sand and an oil-bearing sand in thin sand-mud inter-bedded layers. We show that RI is capable of characterizing all three types of reservoir. In particular, it appears to be more applicable than EI for characterizing tight gas sands. The cross-plots of EI against acoustic impedance (AI) show good characterization for gas sand, but approximately linear trends are found for all three cases. R I, estimated from EI, has a comparable dimension to the acoustic impedance (AI), and retains the interpretation ability of the original RI.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
