Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ http://www.rpl.uh.ed...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2147...
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Seismic attenuation: observations and mechanisms

Authors: M. Batzle; Ronny Hofmann; Manika Prasad; Gautam Kumar; L. Duranti; De‐hua Han;

Seismic attenuation: observations and mechanisms

Abstract

Seismic attenuation and dispersion can be caused by numerous distinct mechanisms. Observed or proposed mechanisms include mineral surface-fluid interaction, microscopic squirt between pores, macroscopic fluid motion between heterogeneous regions, and bulk loss within the fluid phase itself. The lack of an understanding of these various processes renders interpretation of attenuation-related attributes problematic at best. Direct measurement of seismic attenuation (1/Q) and velocity dispersion in the laboratory help discriminate among these mechanisms and ascertain which dominate for particular lithologies or saturation conditions. Fluid motion is a primary mechanism in porous, permeable clastics. In shales, however, bulk fluid motion is inhibited and clay particle interaction with bound water may dominate. Heavy, viscous fluids themselves show bulk losses independent of a rock matrix. All these loss mechanisms are frequency dependent, so observations of 1/Q made at seismic frequencies usually will not agree with sonic log measurements, which, in turn, will not agree with ultrasonic data.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    33
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
33
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%