Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Noise reduction in seismic data using Fourier correlation coefficient filtering

Authors: Douglas Alsdorf;

Noise reduction in seismic data using Fourier correlation coefficient filtering

Abstract

Abstract The correlation coefficient between two frequency (or two wavenumber) components equals the cosine of their phase-angle difference. This relation can be exploited to build a filter that separates noise from signal in seismic data in either the F-X or F-K domain (termed "correlation coefficient filtering"). To implement this filter, seismic data are first divided to form two subsets that are then compared using the cosine function. Signal is defined as the correlative frequencies (or wavelengths) while noncorrelative energy is attributed to noise. Depending on the application, appropriate subsets may consist of (1) groups of adjacent traces or (2) low-fold stacks created from differing shot gathers. When comparing adjacent traces [i.e. (1)], the correlation coefficient filter combines both phase and dip information and assumes that reflections advance relatively little in time across traces and less than the noise. Correlation coefficient filtering of low-fold stacks [i.e., (2)] does not depend on dip. Reflections are assumed to be present in both subsets whereas the noise is found only in one data set. Hence, the reflections are correlative and the noise is noncorrelative. In either case, the filter reduces linearly dipping coherent energy, ground roll, and randomly occurring noise bursts while generally maintaining signal integrity. A primary advantage of this filter is its simplicity. It is implemented much like a simple band-pass filter, thus requiring much less parameterization than alternative noise-reduction methods.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!