Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Formation velocity and density; the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps

Authors: G. H. F. Gardner; L. W. Gardner; A. R. Gregory;

Formation velocity and density; the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps

Abstract

Abstract A multiplicity of factors influence seismic reflection coefficients and the observed gravity of typical sedimentary rocks. Rock velocity and density depend upon the mineral composition and the granular nature of the rock matrix, cementation, porosity, fluid content, and environmental pressure. Depth of burial and geologic age also have an effect.Lithology and porosity can be related empirically to velocity by the time-average equation. This equation is most reliable when the rock is under substantial pressure, is saturated with brine, and contains well-cemented grains. For very low porosity rocks under large pressures, the mineral composition can be related to velocity by the theories of Voigt and Reuss.One effect of pressure variation on velocity results from the opening or closing of microcracks. For porous sedimentary rocks, only the difference between overburden and fluid pressure affects the microcrack system. Existing theory does not take into account the effect of microcrack closure on the elastic behavior of rocks under pressure or the chemical interaction between water and clay particles.The theory of Gassmann can be used to calculate the effect of different saturating fluids on the P-wave velocity of porous rocks. The effect may be large enough in shallow, recent sediments to permit gas sands to be distinguished from water sands on seismic records. At depths greater than about 6000 ft, however, the reflection coefficient becomes essentially independent of the nature of the fluid.Data show the systematic relationship between velocity and density in sedimentary rocks. As a result, reflection coefficients can often be estimated satisfactorily from velocity information alone.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2K
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.01%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.01%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2K
Top 0.01%
Top 0.01%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!