
doi: 10.1190/1.1439069
Abstract Second vertical derivative methods developed by Henderson and Zietz, Elkins, Rosenbach, and Danes are applied to various mathematical harmonic fields and the response of the methods is investigated. All methods give good results as long as the wavelength of the anomaly is large compared with station spacing. As the wavelength decreases, Elkins' formulae give progressively lower values. Rosenbach's values decrease slightly, but values are still very close to correct. Henderson and Zietz's values are about halfway between the above ones. Danes' results can be made correct to the degree of accuracy of the input data.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
