
doi: 10.1190/1.1438987
Abstract In an article in a recent issue of the Oil and Gas Journal (Gardner, 1961), entitled "Let's make it the AAP_G Bulletin again," the complaint was aired that the Bulletin is devoting less attention to oil finding and more to research and general geological problems. Contributions from "commercial" geologists have declined and university contributions have held steady while contributions from government survey people and researchers have increased markedly. The number of oil field studies printed has decreased from 32 in 1940-41 to 4 in 1960-61. The article suggests that the lack of papers from commercial geologists reflects a lack of interest in the profession, particularly by younger geologists, since the character of the editorial board has not changed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
