Preventing Second Cancers in Cancer Survivors
Copyright policy )Preventing Second Cancers in Cancer Survivors
To provide a systematic review of the secondary prevention practices of cancer survivors guided by the Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior.Articles published in peer-reviewed journals from 1996-2007.Despite their increased risk for second cancers, few cancer survivors maintain regular follow-up with a clinician knowledgeable of late effects. Cancer screening rates for cancer survivors are below optimal levels recommended for the general population. Multiple antecedents explain survivors' health practices. Few tested interventions are available to promote secondary prevention practices among cancer survivors.Cancer survivors are less likely to adopt secondary prevention practices than individuals without a cancer history.Nurses can encourage cancer survivors to adopt secondary prevention practices by providing positive reinforcement, support, and education. As more comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines for longitudinal care become available, nurses will be able to provide care to survivors with greater confidence and certainty.
- University of Manitoba Canada
Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Motivation, Health Behavior, Oncology Nursing, Age Factors, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Professional-Patient Relations, Models, Theoretical, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Research Design, Ethnicity, Humans, Female, Survivors, Child, Aged
Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Motivation, Health Behavior, Oncology Nursing, Age Factors, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Professional-Patient Relations, Models, Theoretical, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Research Design, Ethnicity, Humans, Female, Survivors, Child, Aged
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).19 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!