
Continued safety assessment is essential for any newly approved therapy. Drotrecogin alfa (activated; DrotAA), which is approved for use in severe sepsis, has undergone clinical trials with corresponding safety analyses since 1995. However, the only comprehensive review of all trials is that reported in 2003 by Bernard and coworkers. This is an important review that focuses on the safety profile of DrotAA in all published studies (six randomized clinical trials and five national registry studies) and in previously unpublished data. DrotAA treatment is associated with an increased risk for bleeding (which in general is manageable). Nevertheless, the available evidence shows that any adverse effects of DrotAA are outweighed by its benefits in patients with severe sepsis who are at high risk for death. So far, more than 9,000 patients have been enrolled in clinical trials involving DrotAA, providing a valuable safety database. It is of note that although DrotAA does increase the risk of bleeding, this has not been associated with an overall increase in the rate of all severe adverse events.
Adult, Heparin, Contraindications, Multiple Organ Failure, Age Factors, Hemorrhage, Review, Recombinant Proteins, Anti-Infective Agents, Risk Factors, Sepsis, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Drug Interactions, drotrecogin alfa; sepsis, Child, APACHE, Protein C, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Adult, Heparin, Contraindications, Multiple Organ Failure, Age Factors, Hemorrhage, Review, Recombinant Proteins, Anti-Infective Agents, Risk Factors, Sepsis, Humans, Surgical Wound Infection, Drug Interactions, drotrecogin alfa; sepsis, Child, APACHE, Protein C, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
