
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>Abstract Background The immature granulocyte count has been reported to be a marker of infection and sepsis. The difference in leukocyte subfractions (delta neutrophil index, DNI) in ADVIA 2120 reflects the fraction of circulating immature granulocytes in the blood. This study evaluated the clinical utility of DNI as a severity and prediction marker in critically ill patients with sepsis. Methods One hundred and three patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit with sepsis were studied. DNI (the difference in leukocyte subfractions identified by myeloperoxidase and nuclear lobularity channels) was determined using a specific blood cell analyzer. Results Forty four patients (42.7%) were diagnosed with severe sepsis/septic shock. Overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) occurred in 40 (38.8%). DNI was significantly higher in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock and overt DIC than in patients without (p < 0.05). DNI correlated with DIC score (r = 0.54, p < 0.001). We observed a monotonic increase in the proportion of overt DIC and severe sepsis/septic shock associated with increasing quartiles of DNI (p < 0.001). A DNI value > 6.5% was a better indicator of severe sepsis/septic shock than C-reactive protein, lactate, white blood cell count, and absolute neutrophil count (sensitivity, 81.3%; specificity, 91.0%; positive predictive value, 88.6%; and negative predictive value, 84.7%). In 36 (82%) of the 44 patients with severe sepsis/septic shock, DNI values were already elevated up to 12 hours before the onset of organ/circulatory failure. Conclusions DNI may be used as a marker of disease severity in critically ill patients with sepsis. High levels of DNI may help to identify patients with an impending risk of developing severe sepsis/septic shock.
Adult, Male, Neutrophils, Critical Illness, 610, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Neutrophils/immunology*, Absolute Neutrophil Count, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Leukocyte Count, Sepsis/diagnosis*, Sepsis/pathology*, Sepsis, Humans, Aged, Disseminate Intravascular Coagulation, Middle Aged, Flow Cytometry, Flow Cytometry/methods, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Severity of Illness Index*, Intensive Care Units, Infectious Diseases, Severe Sepsis, Female, Research Article
Adult, Male, Neutrophils, Critical Illness, 610, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Neutrophils/immunology*, Absolute Neutrophil Count, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Leukocyte Count, Sepsis/diagnosis*, Sepsis/pathology*, Sepsis, Humans, Aged, Disseminate Intravascular Coagulation, Middle Aged, Flow Cytometry, Flow Cytometry/methods, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Severity of Illness Index*, Intensive Care Units, Infectious Diseases, Severe Sepsis, Female, Research Article
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 113 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
