Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

MYCOBACTERIUM KANSASII LUNG INFECTIONS COMPARED TO OTHER NONTUBERCULOUS MYCOBACTERIA

Authors: Idoia Salinas Garrido; Eunate Arana Arri; Sandra Pedrero Tejada; Borja Ortiz De Urbina Antia; Elena Urra Zalbidegoitia; Rafael Zalacain Jorge; Beatriz Gonzalez Quero; +1 Authors

MYCOBACTERIUM KANSASII LUNG INFECTIONS COMPARED TO OTHER NONTUBERCULOUS MYCOBACTERIA

Abstract

Aim: Analyze clinical-radiological features and clinical course of M.kansasii pulmonary disease compared to other NTMs Methods: Retrospective, descriptive study of NTM pulmonary disease from 1997 to 2016. 2007 ATS criteria were fulfilled. We evaluated:demographic data, risk factors, symptomatology, radiology, coinfection, recurrence and overall mortality per year Results: 327cases of NTM lung disease:274(83.7%)M. Kansasii and 53(16.3%)other NTM. Comparison between them are seen in figure1.M. Kansasii group, patients were younger, males, smokers and with cancer. No differences were found in symptoms.M. kansasii was associated with more cavitation, unilaterality and upper lobes predominance. Other NTMs infections were associated with bronchiectasis, nodules or “tree in bud” infiltrates with middle lobes predominance and more coinfection. Rates of recurrence were similar in both groups and the overall-1year mortality rate, including NTMosis-related mortality and other causes mortality. Sputum conversion was maintained in 85.8% of M.kansasii vs 75.5% in other NTM and radiological resolution in 60%vs39% Conclusions: There are relevant differences between M. Kansasii lung infections and those caused by other NTMs:1. They appear to occur more in male smokers, in the fifth decade and with a history of neoplasia 2. They are associated with cavitation, unilaterality and upper lobe predominance 3. Sputum conversion and radiological resolution rates are higher

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!