
Abstract Can we ever understand the day when four civilian planes were turned into deadly weapons, killing thousands of people? Maybe not, and maybe ‘understanding’ in the sense of a historian would only equal an apology for terrorism. Nevertheless, these events need to be seen in a larger context, and it is this context which is being systematically silenced. There is an urgent need for explanation of what happened, and one has to make a strict distinction between such efforts at explanation and a justification, which I would never want to provide. My thoughts about this event and its consequences are no more than the reflections of an archaeologist who worked ten years ago for a humanitarian agency during the civil war in Afghanistan.Neither I nor many of my friends and colleagues feel that we can just go on with our lives as though nothing has changed. Whether in private life, seminars or the workplace, discussions about terrorism and its state-sponsored response occupy a primary position. In a graduat...
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
