Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

An Improved Method for the Production of Slides from Oversized Samples of Glycol Methacrylate-Embedded Tissues: Application for Optical Disector Based Stereology

Authors: Lynne B. Charleston; Angela C. Thyer; Nancy A. Klein; Michael R. Soules; Jay S. Charleston;

An Improved Method for the Production of Slides from Oversized Samples of Glycol Methacrylate-Embedded Tissues: Application for Optical Disector Based Stereology

Abstract

AbstractAn improvement in embedment and sectioning methodology of large tissue samples in glycol methacrylate resin is presented. The method improves efficiency by allowing relatively large tissue slabs, or multiple sets of smaller tissue samples to be embedded in large 2 × 3 inch blocks. The method described has general applicability for many histological procedures where large tissue sections are required. In the example presented here, the method also provides for relatively thick tissue sections to be generated (20–70 μm), thereby meeting the requirements of the optical dissector method for use with modern stereology procedures. The method's impact on increased efficiency for application of these stereological methods is discussed. (The J Histotechnol 26:49, 2003)Submitted: July 18, 2002; Accepted with revisions January 14, 2003

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!