
doi: 10.1179/bjo.22.3.259
pmid: 7577876
This study examined the effectiveness of three different aesthetic ranking systems. The Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (10 photographs), a numerical scale illustrated with three photographs and a numerical scale with only two photographs were assessed. Ten general dental practitioners ranked the attractiveness of dentitions using each aesthetic scale. A greater tendency to underscore was detected when the dentists used the two-photograph scale. Reducing the number of photographs in the aesthetic scale did not significantly improve the dentists ability to rank dental aesthetics.
Male, Observer Variation, Analysis of Variance, Orthodontics, Esthetics, Dental, Reference Standards, Severity of Illness Index, Statistics, Nonparametric, Photography, Humans, Female, Malocclusion
Male, Observer Variation, Analysis of Variance, Orthodontics, Esthetics, Dental, Reference Standards, Severity of Illness Index, Statistics, Nonparametric, Photography, Humans, Female, Malocclusion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
