Orthodontic Uncertainties

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Oct 1975 English Publisher:SAGE PublicationsJournal:British Journal of Orthodontics, volume 2, pages 227-230 (issn: 0301-228X,

Copyright policy )

Authors: J F, Gravely; D B, Johnson;

doi: 10.1179/bjo.2.4.227

pmid: 1065360

Orthodontic Uncertainties

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The consistency with which two examiners were able to carry out a number of orthodontic assessments has been examined. Occlusal assessments were generally found to be the most reliable and assessments of soft tissue factors the least reliable. The implications of errors in orthodontic diagnostic assessments are discussed.

Related Organizations

Keywords

Diagnosis, Differential, Judgment, Humans, Child, Malocclusion

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	5
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average