
AbstractIn ordinary survey work of a lower order, i.e., work which does not attempt to attain geodetic accuracy, the most popular methods of finding latitude astronomically involve observations of the altitudes of celestial bodies, and it has long been recognized that observed altitudes are liable to serious errors from two main sources, namely, altitude bubble error and errors in the assumed values of astronomical refraction. The former can arise from the bubble not indicating the true horizontal (instrumental error) and/or imperfect levelling up of the vertical circle alidade bubble (personal error), which is rather a delicate operation even when using a prism reader or other aids. The instrumental error may, of course, be eliminated by taking readings with both faces of the instrunlent, though there are instances when this may not be possible. Comprehensive refraction tables are published which give correcting factors for varying states of temperature and pressure. But these are not the only two condit...
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
