
doi: 10.1177/22.7.751
pmid: 4136770
Quantitative cytology requires accurate representation of a specimen's optical densities. As the requirements for measurement precision increase, instrument-induced errors become increasingly more difficult to reduce to the point at which their effect on experimental data is insignificant compared to the measured parameters. Shading induces a significant amount of amplitude ambiguity to data obtained from a scanning system. A method of shading correction on single pixels is introduced as a new way to reduce some errors that currently plague scanning systems.
Autoanalysis, Time Factors, Staining and Labeling, Computers, Histocytochemistry, Cells, Computers, Analog, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Methods, Mass Screening, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Lighting
Autoanalysis, Time Factors, Staining and Labeling, Computers, Histocytochemistry, Cells, Computers, Analog, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Methods, Mass Screening, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Lighting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
