Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal for Vascular...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Carotid Artery Restenosis: Ultrasonographic Characteristics

Authors: Guedes Vaz; Miguel Maia; Sandrina Braga; Joana Ferreira; Pedro Brandão; João Vasconcelos;

Carotid Artery Restenosis: Ultrasonographic Characteristics

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of our study was to evaluate the ultrasonographic characteristics of recurrent carotid stenosis in patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. Methods We performed carotid ultrasound examinations on patients who had undergone unilateral carotid endarterectomy between 2002 and 2009. Patients with bilateral and/or endovascular procedures were excluded. All ultrasound examinations were performed by the same registered vascular technologist. Results One hundred male and 25 female patients were studied. The average time between surgery and the ultrasound examination was 38.8 months (range, 3–99.2 months). Twenty-nine (23.2%) patients had recurrent carotid artery stenosis after unilateral endarterectomy. Of these, 17 patients were found to have recurrent carotid artery stenosis classified as <50%; 7 patients had recurrent stenosis in the range of 50% and 69%, and 5 patients had >70% diameter-reducing lesions. Plaques associated with recurrent carotid stenosis were significantly less echogenic, more acoustically homogenous, and had a smoother surface contour. Compared with the primary carotid stenosis (nonintervened side), plaques associated with recurrent carotid stenosis were more often hypoechoic (58.6% versus 8.1%), acoustically homogenous (69% versus 44.6%) and smooth-surfaced (93.1% versus 74.3%). Also, the longer the interval between surgery and the carotid sonographic examination, the more similar the ultrasonographic characteristics were between the two groups. Conclusions The different sonographic characteristics of primary carotid stenosis and recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy in the same patients, are associated with different outcomes for the two conditions. There is a current clinical consensus that patients presenting with recurrent symptoms after carotid endarterectomy should be treated, but the best management for asymptomatic patients with recurrent carotid artery stenosis remains uncertain.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?