
pmid: 7549447
The efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (0.3%) ophthalmic solution and rifamycin (1%) ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis and blepharitis was compared in this randomized, double-masked, parallel-group study. Forty-one patients, 19 on ciprofloxacin and 22 on rifamycin, were culture-positive on admission and evaluated for efficacy. There was clinical improvement in more than 90% of patients in each group at the end of the seven-day treatment period. However, clinical cure rates on day 7 appeared to be higher with ciprofloxacin (53%) than rifamycin (23%; p = 0.061, Mann-Whitney test). Bacteriological eradication rates were comparable: the infecting organisms were eradicated in 68% of patients on ciprofloxacin and 77% with rifamycin. There were no serious adverse reactions to either treatment. One patient in each group was withdrawn on account of a mild allergy. In conclusion, topical ciprofloxacin was effective and well tolerated and would be a particularly useful agent for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis and blepharitis.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Blepharitis, Adolescent, Bacteria, Administration, Topical, Eyelids, Drug Tolerance, Eye Infections, Bacterial, Conjunctivitis, Bacterial, Double-Blind Method, Ciprofloxacin, Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female, Child, Conjunctiva, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Blepharitis, Adolescent, Bacteria, Administration, Topical, Eyelids, Drug Tolerance, Eye Infections, Bacterial, Conjunctivitis, Bacterial, Double-Blind Method, Ciprofloxacin, Acute Disease, Chronic Disease, Humans, Female, Child, Conjunctiva, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
