Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of the Transpalpebral Tonometer TGDc-01 with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

Authors: Gabi Shemesh; Moshe Lazar; Anat Loewenstein; Lea Baras Top; Michael Waisbourd;

Comparison of the Transpalpebral Tonometer TGDc-01 with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by the transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01 and by the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Methods IOP was measured by the conventional GAT and the TGDc-01 tonometer. Central corneal thickness (CCI) was measured for all eyes. Results Sixty-seven consecutive patients (123 eyes) participated. The mean difference between the 2 techniques (TGDc-01-GAT) was −0.93 mmHg, SD=2.74 (p=0.0002, paired t-test), and 70% of the measurements were within ±2 mmHg. The correlation coefficient was 0.67 (p<0.0001). A subgroup analysis according to CCT was conducted. For CCT <520 μm, the mean IOP difference was 0.67 mmHg (p=0.13); r=0.75 (p<0.001). For CCT 520 μm-580 μm, the mean IOP difference was −1.08 mmHg (p=0.001); r=0.69 (p<0.0001). For CCT>580 μm, the mean IOP difference was −2.29 mmHg (p=0.0003); r=0.57 (p=0.003). Conclusions TGDC-01 may estimate IOP with a fair agreement to the Goldmann tonometer, although caution should be used for patients who require precise IOP measurements. TGDc-01 measured higher IOPs than Goldman tonometry for thinner corneas, a trend that was reversed for thicker corneas. This tonometer is a portable device, easy to use, does not require anesthetic drops, and may be suitable for IOP screening.

Keywords

Cornea, Tonometry, Ocular, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Intraocular Pressure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!