
Development of the cochlear implant, discussed in this article, depended vitally on deaf people being persuaded to undergo implantation. Media "reconstruction" of the device as the "bionic ear" was typically encouraged by implant pioneers. Unexpectedly, however, a "counter-rhetoric" based on a very different understanding of deafness emerged. With it, deaf people are slowly succeeding in gaining influence over the further deployment of the technology. The analysis suggests modifications to existing theoretical models of technological change in medicine.
Persons with Disabilities, Financing, Government, History, Communication, Australia, Biomedical Technology, Patient Advocacy, Medicare, Europe, Cochlear Implants, Attitude, Equipment and Supplies, Health, Physicians, Humans, Industry, Mass Media, Patient Participation, Child, Hearing Disorders
Persons with Disabilities, Financing, Government, History, Communication, Australia, Biomedical Technology, Patient Advocacy, Medicare, Europe, Cochlear Implants, Attitude, Equipment and Supplies, Health, Physicians, Humans, Industry, Mass Media, Patient Participation, Child, Hearing Disorders
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
