Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Anglican Theological...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Book Review: Theology and the End of Doctrine

Authors: William J. Danaher;

Book Review: Theology and the End of Doctrine

Abstract

Theology and the End of Doctrine. By Christine Helmer. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 2014. xvi + 196 pp. $35.00 (paper).Christine Helmer has written a book that marks a critical turning point in postliberal theology. To give some background, in The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age (WJK, 1984) George Lindbeck hoped to bypass the impasses in ecumenical and academic discussions regarding the role of doctrine. Where liberals treated doctrines as correlates of a shared religious experience, conservatives treated them as truth claims about objective realities. Seeking to transcend these mutually antagonistic perspectives, Lindbeck developed a typology in order to present a third option. Instead of treating theology as an "experiential/expressive" or a "cognitive/propositional" inquiry, Lindbeck offered a "cultural/linguistic" approach that treats theology as the grammar the church employs to maintain its own self-understanding.In the thirty years since the publication of Lindbeck's volume, there have been many interpretations of this postliberal project by Christopher Seitz, Ephraim Radner, Kevin Vanhoozer, and Bruce Marshall, among others. However, later iterations have generally accepted Lindbecks characterizations of the current plight of theology and the typology he constructed. They have not wondered why his approach has been so appealing, or what price is paid when theological appeals to experience and truth are summarily dismissed as a "type" of reflection no longer viable.By tracing the history behind the impasse Lindbeck inherited, particularly as it appeared in German theology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, Helmer offers a crucial restatement of the postliberal project. This enables her to nuance what Lindbecks typology too clearly distinguished: appeals to experience and truth claims, rather than representing a failed ap- proach, remain essential to theology. Indeed, postliberal theological projects that fail to provide these connections inevitability signal the "end" of theology as a meaningful resource for Christians. "Theologians," she writes provocatively, "are not museum docents" whose role is "to point out doctrinal artifacts from lost civilizations"; rather, they must "show how God still has to do with humanity" (p. 169).Helmer draws key insights from Schleiermacher and Barth to retrieve the role of experience and truth in postliberal theology. From Schleiermacher, she argues that experience is always already part of language and culture. Therefore, no account of the latter (experience and culture) is ad- equate without an account of the former (experience). Such an account is found in Schleiermachers New Testament studies of the acclamations of Jesus as the Christ, which illustrate the key role that experience plays in the social construction of consciousness and, by implication, language and culture. …

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!