
doi: 10.1176/ps.43.2.136
pmid: 1349295
Many families provide mentally ill relatives with a residence and other support. Although professionals increasingly acknowledge the importance of the supportive role families play, families continue to report that they receive too little information from professionals about the patient, particularly when the family acts as caregiver. The authors suggest that mental health professionals' views about confidentiality may prevent them from providing information to families and urge professionals to rethink the issue of confidentiality and its application to families acting as caregivers. The authors conclude that certain information about a patient can--and should--be shared with families who are in a caregiver role without violating clinical, legal, or ethical principles.
Adult, Male, Mental Disorders, Malpractice, Disclosure, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Home Care Services, Insanity Defense, United States, Caregivers, Patient Education as Topic, Schizophrenia, Humans, Patient Compliance, Ethics, Medical, Schizophrenic Psychology, Homicide, Confidentiality, Antipsychotic Agents
Adult, Male, Mental Disorders, Malpractice, Disclosure, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Home Care Services, Insanity Defense, United States, Caregivers, Patient Education as Topic, Schizophrenia, Humans, Patient Compliance, Ethics, Medical, Schizophrenic Psychology, Homicide, Confidentiality, Antipsychotic Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
