Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Why Study Treatment Outcome?

Authors: M. Jo Namerow; Steven M. Mirin;

Why Study Treatment Outcome?

Abstract

Concern about the spiraling cost of mental health care has increased the need for reliable data about the outcomes of such care. Treatment outcome studies, although difficult to design and carry out, are essential in demonstrating the efficacy of psychiatric treatment, rationalizing clinical decision making, and encouraging public support for the availability of appropriate, cost-effective care for the mentally ill. Ideally, outcome studies should focus not only on clinical symptomatology but also on patients' social, interpersonal, and occupational adjustment as well as on factors that, taken together, shape the quality of life. The authors discuss these issues and some of the impediments to collecting useful outcome data, including the complexity of the mental health service delivery system and problems related to patient selection, study design, and how treatment is defined.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Hospitalization, Mental Health Services, Prospective Payment System, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Health Services Research, United States

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    78
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
78
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!