
doi: 10.1176/ps.34.2.129
pmid: 6860396
Many past studies of data on deinstitutionalization have used an overly simplistic and often misleading approach, which has led to a number of "myths" of deinstitutionalization. The authors present data on the changing mental health service system collected by the Division of Biometry and Epidemiology of the National Institute of Mental Health, and they analyze the data to reveal trends that disprove a number of the commonly accepted myths. Through their analysis they show that outpatient care has not replaced inpatient care, that public institutions, particularly state mental hospitals, have not been replaced by community-based facilities, and that private resources have not replaced public ones as the bearer of the cost of caring for the mentally ill. They conclude that the availability and quality of mental health services and the effect of these services on patients and their communities are difficult issues for future research.
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Admission, Mental Disorders, Humans, Residential Treatment, Community Mental Health Services, Deinstitutionalization, United States
Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Admission, Mental Disorders, Humans, Residential Treatment, Community Mental Health Services, Deinstitutionalization, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 96 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
